<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Home Page + 1 New Setting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/</link>
	<description>Passpack keeps your logins safe, organized and available 24/7. You can share passwords with your team in 100% privacy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>@Kent, I was reviewing my previous comment and I must do a precisation to avoid that people could misunderstand what I wanted to say.
I understand your concerns, but it is important that you know that the minus bug that you found was an exception. Passpack is a very stable system. The fact that we have a very high level of renewing of the service (almost the 100% for Group and Team plans) is a clear demonstration of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kent, I was reviewing my previous comment and I must do a precisation to avoid that people could misunderstand what I wanted to say.<br />
I understand your concerns, but it is important that you know that the minus bug that you found was an exception. Passpack is a very stable system. The fact that we have a very high level of renewing of the service (almost the 100% for Group and Team plans) is a clear demonstration of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>@Kent, thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kent, thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>@beedster, the best practice is that when someone leaves your workgroup, you stop the sharing and, absolutely important, you change the involved passwords. All the other workgroup&#039;s users will receive the modification in a transparent way and you are sure that the former coworker can not access to the specific service anymore.

What do you intend with &quot;they could still use another workgroup members account&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@beedster, the best practice is that when someone leaves your workgroup, you stop the sharing and, absolutely important, you change the involved passwords. All the other workgroup&#8217;s users will receive the modification in a transparent way and you are sure that the former coworker can not access to the specific service anymore.</p>
<p>What do you intend with &#8220;they could still use another workgroup members account&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Larsson</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>Thank you for answering, both here and on Twitter Francesco!

First of all, my complaints are due to the fact that I think you really have an awesome product in its core. If I thought it would have been so-so I would simply have moved on.

It became sort of an anti-climax to find your great product and then stumbling over bugs that hinder me from using it.

I&#039;ve previously used KeePassX with the database stored at Dropbox. It worked pretty well, I had access to my passwords in Windows, GNU/Linux and on my Android phone using KeePassDroid.

I like Passpack because it&#039;s easily accessible. Available on more or less all computers that have a web browser.

When offering to store someones passwords. A great responsibility is laid onto you. But at the same time, what can free customers really demand? It seems like a match not exactly made in heaven.

Your reply was very informative and honest. It convinced me to step away. KeePassX here I come. I&#039;ll keep an eye on the product and hope it takes off. If it does I&#039;ll be back as a paying customer. I think you have a very special product, but I can&#039;t trust it at the moment.

Best regards and good luck, Kent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for answering, both here and on Twitter Francesco!</p>
<p>First of all, my complaints are due to the fact that I think you really have an awesome product in its core. If I thought it would have been so-so I would simply have moved on.</p>
<p>It became sort of an anti-climax to find your great product and then stumbling over bugs that hinder me from using it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve previously used KeePassX with the database stored at Dropbox. It worked pretty well, I had access to my passwords in Windows, GNU/Linux and on my Android phone using KeePassDroid.</p>
<p>I like Passpack because it&#8217;s easily accessible. Available on more or less all computers that have a web browser.</p>
<p>When offering to store someones passwords. A great responsibility is laid onto you. But at the same time, what can free customers really demand? It seems like a match not exactly made in heaven.</p>
<p>Your reply was very informative and honest. It convinced me to step away. KeePassX here I come. I&#8217;ll keep an eye on the product and hope it takes off. If it does I&#8217;ll be back as a paying customer. I think you have a very special product, but I can&#8217;t trust it at the moment.</p>
<p>Best regards and good luck, Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beedster</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>beedster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sharing with a workgroup. One account to hold all the passwords and all users share passwords with that.
My problem is if someone leaves. Sure I cancel sharing to their account, but they could still use another workgroup members account. My problem is that I can&#039;t control the packign keys of individual accounts. 
Is there a plan to have client accounts controlled by a central administrator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sharing with a workgroup. One account to hold all the passwords and all users share passwords with that.<br />
My problem is if someone leaves. Sure I cancel sharing to their account, but they could still use another workgroup members account. My problem is that I can&#8217;t control the packign keys of individual accounts.<br />
Is there a plan to have client accounts controlled by a central administrator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 04:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>Hi Kent, thanks for you passionate feedback.

Passpack exists from 4 years but our revenues are still very low. So, we are not able to grow the company. At contrary, recently, I have remained alone to develope (part-time) new features, answer to customer requests, manage the ecommerce system, etcetera.

I try to do my best to offer a good service but sometimes something goes wrong because it is impossible to cover a complex system like Passpack with exaustive tests.

Our old users can confirm that Passpack rarely had serious bugs. This time, I admit that I was superficial because I was relatively sure that the new jQuery was substantial identical to the previous release. During these years, we have never had problems with jQuery, but, I know, there is always a first time, and this was that time.

Now, I perfectly understand your need of a totally reliable system, and so I can understand if you will move to another service. There are other great password managers, like LastPass or, if you prefer open source, Clipperz. Personally, I hate systems too invasive like LastPass, but a lot of people likes exactly this aspect. In any case, it is always your choice.

I will be happy if you want to continue to use Passpack but, if not, I will be happy the same. Life is fun for a lot of reasons and every experience is useful :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kent, thanks for you passionate feedback.</p>
<p>Passpack exists from 4 years but our revenues are still very low. So, we are not able to grow the company. At contrary, recently, I have remained alone to develope (part-time) new features, answer to customer requests, manage the ecommerce system, etcetera.</p>
<p>I try to do my best to offer a good service but sometimes something goes wrong because it is impossible to cover a complex system like Passpack with exaustive tests.</p>
<p>Our old users can confirm that Passpack rarely had serious bugs. This time, I admit that I was superficial because I was relatively sure that the new jQuery was substantial identical to the previous release. During these years, we have never had problems with jQuery, but, I know, there is always a first time, and this was that time.</p>
<p>Now, I perfectly understand your need of a totally reliable system, and so I can understand if you will move to another service. There are other great password managers, like LastPass or, if you prefer open source, Clipperz. Personally, I hate systems too invasive like LastPass, but a lot of people likes exactly this aspect. In any case, it is always your choice.</p>
<p>I will be happy if you want to continue to use Passpack but, if not, I will be happy the same. Life is fun for a lot of reasons and every experience is useful :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Larsson</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>Availability has been flaky the last couple of days, maybe more as I wasn&#039;t a user before that and couldn&#039;t see it. The positive aspect is that one of your developers has seen my tweeting about it and corrected two out of three bugs so far. See: http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23passpack

The negative side to this is availability. PLEASE take extreme caution so that you do not introduce bugs when you update jQuery for example. High availability is essential to me if Passpack should be considered an option at all. You can solve this by not working on the live site and setup tests which makes certain the most basic things work. Like accessing the Auto-login tab (bug 1/3 I&#039;ve reported) and adding a new password (bug 2/3). I am frankly shocked that you allowed them to slip out into production.

You have a nice product. Please fix the bugs (I&#039;m reporting one more on Twitter in a couple of minutes) and proceed slowly. Users are actually depending on your application. I was about to buy even though I am fine with the free option just to support you guys. Now I&#039;m going to wait a month and see if you solve your quality issues.

I was really happy to see your product. Such a smooth browser integration for example. To see these kind of issues arise saddens me. And I think you need to do something about them now.

I&#039;m giving you a couple of more chances. It would be sad to have to part ways. You have a security and the user interface just right. Except for the bugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Availability has been flaky the last couple of days, maybe more as I wasn&#8217;t a user before that and couldn&#8217;t see it. The positive aspect is that one of your developers has seen my tweeting about it and corrected two out of three bugs so far. See: <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23passpack" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23passpack</a></p>
<p>The negative side to this is availability. PLEASE take extreme caution so that you do not introduce bugs when you update jQuery for example. High availability is essential to me if Passpack should be considered an option at all. You can solve this by not working on the live site and setup tests which makes certain the most basic things work. Like accessing the Auto-login tab (bug 1/3 I&#8217;ve reported) and adding a new password (bug 2/3). I am frankly shocked that you allowed them to slip out into production.</p>
<p>You have a nice product. Please fix the bugs (I&#8217;m reporting one more on Twitter in a couple of minutes) and proceed slowly. Users are actually depending on your application. I was about to buy even though I am fine with the free option just to support you guys. Now I&#8217;m going to wait a month and see if you solve your quality issues.</p>
<p>I was really happy to see your product. Such a smooth browser integration for example. To see these kind of issues arise saddens me. And I think you need to do something about them now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m giving you a couple of more chances. It would be sad to have to part ways. You have a security and the user interface just right. Except for the bugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>Why did you revert the changes? :o

P.S.: I&#039;m noticing issues logging in to Google (I tried on Chrome and Firefox...): auto-login with the button doesn&#039;t work (only copy/paste!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you revert the changes? :o</p>
<p>P.S.: I&#8217;m noticing issues logging in to Google (I tried on Chrome and Firefox&#8230;): auto-login with the button doesn&#8217;t work (only copy/paste!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4594</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4594</guid>
		<description>Ok, we reversed to the previous home.
Thanks for all feedbacks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, we reversed to the previous home.<br />
Thanks for all feedbacks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2011/02/new-home-page-1-new-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3921#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>Just a little feedback, I think adding a login form to the front page is a great step forward, but I find the design of the front page to be a step back. The previous design was informative and professional, but this one seems somewhat thrown together...

Of course this doesn&#039;t affect your amazing product, keep up the good work! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little feedback, I think adding a login form to the front page is a great step forward, but I find the design of the front page to be a step back. The previous design was informative and professional, but this one seems somewhat thrown together&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course this doesn&#8217;t affect your amazing product, keep up the good work! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
