<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto-login 2.0 Follow Up: Switch Versions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/</link>
	<description>Passpack keeps your logins safe, organized and available 24/7. You can share passwords with your team in 100% privacy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the updates.  I agree with Paul, most Passpack users are going to be a bit more security conscious then the general population.  

I look forward to a solution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the updates.  I agree with Paul, most Passpack users are going to be a bit more security conscious then the general population.  </p>
<p>I look forward to a solution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul.
There is actually a way to make the Auto-login 2.0 release compatible with NoScript. But there would be some issues in implementing it. If possible, I prefer to mantain the double-iframe structure.

However I understand. I have already contacted Giorgio Maone of NoScript. He is Italian like me so... that makes it easy! I&#039;m sure we will find some sort of solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul.<br />
There is actually a way to make the Auto-login 2.0 release compatible with NoScript. But there would be some issues in implementing it. If possible, I prefer to mantain the double-iframe structure.</p>
<p>However I understand. I have already contacted Giorgio Maone of NoScript. He is Italian like me so&#8230; that makes it easy! I&#8217;m sure we will find some sort of solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>The 1.0 button doesn&#039;t work with my bank.  I was hopeful that the 2.0 button would work.  

I would think that most Passpack users are security conscious.  Therefor, some significant percentage of them are probably NoScript users as well.  If the 1.0 button has an uncertain future and there is no interoperability with NoScript moving forward, this is starting to look like a deal killer.  :(

And I had such high hopes for Passpack.  It solves the problem of keeping multiple machines in sync that is present with KeepassX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1.0 button doesn&#8217;t work with my bank.  I was hopeful that the 2.0 button would work.  </p>
<p>I would think that most Passpack users are security conscious.  Therefor, some significant percentage of them are probably NoScript users as well.  If the 1.0 button has an uncertain future and there is no interoperability with NoScript moving forward, this is starting to look like a deal killer.  :(</p>
<p>And I had such high hopes for Passpack.  It solves the problem of keeping multiple machines in sync that is present with KeepassX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2828</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2828</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,
We tried a combination of Anti-XSS and whitelisting, but it&#039;s not enough. Passpack options are in double nested iframes which load Passpack.com content on any website. It&#039;s the iframe limitations that ultimately block the popup from fully loading:

http://noscript.net/faq#qa4_8

If you&#039;re able to play with the settings and get things working - please let us know. We haven&#039;t managed.

I don&#039;t know if auto-login 1.0 will be around forever, but it&#039;ll be here for a while to come (it&#039;s the only option for IE6).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,<br />
We tried a combination of Anti-XSS and whitelisting, but it&#8217;s not enough. Passpack options are in double nested iframes which load Passpack.com content on any website. It&#8217;s the iframe limitations that ultimately block the popup from fully loading:</p>
<p><a href="http://noscript.net/faq#qa4_8" rel="nofollow">http://noscript.net/faq#qa4_8</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re able to play with the settings and get things working &#8211; please let us know. We haven&#8217;t managed.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if auto-login 1.0 will be around forever, but it&#8217;ll be here for a while to come (it&#8217;s the only option for IE6).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no fix for the noscript interoperability?  Can&#039;t it be addressed in the Anti-XSS Protection Exceptions? Will the 1.0 button remain indefinitely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no fix for the noscript interoperability?  Can&#8217;t it be addressed in the Anti-XSS Protection Exceptions? Will the 1.0 button remain indefinitely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>@Erik
There is a work around, you need to use the older version of the button. Please read the second paragraph under &quot;Example 2&quot; for instructions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Erik<br />
There is a work around, you need to use the older version of the button. Please read the second paragraph under &#8220;Example 2&#8243; for instructions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2009/08/auto-login-2-0-follow-up-switch-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.passpack.com/?p=3237#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>Disabling NoScript is not a real option for me.  Please post a new blog entry when there is some sort of workaround.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disabling NoScript is not a real option for me.  Please post a new blog entry when there is some sort of workaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
