<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passpack&#8217;s Whitelist&#8230;It&#8217;s Unanimous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/</link>
	<description>Passpack keeps your logins safe, organized and available 24/7. You can share passwords with your team in 100% privacy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passpack And OpenID: Under the Hood &#171; Passpack Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Passpack And OpenID: Under the Hood &#171; Passpack Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passpack.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-639</guid>
		<description>[...] end we decided that instead of a &#8220;whitelist&#8221;, the Sign In page will display icons of OpenID providers which work well with Passpack, and we&#8217;d work something out so that no one would be excluded - icon or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] end we decided that instead of a &#8220;whitelist&#8221;, the Sign In page will display icons of OpenID providers which work well with Passpack, and we&#8217;d work something out so that no one would be excluded &#8211; icon or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passpack.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-638</guid>
		<description>@TB
No, that list shouldn&#039;t get too long. We&#039;re only putting a select few OPs in there. The rest will be accepted, but just typed in manually.

OpenID support for Desktop and Offline? Oh dear, I have no idea. You&#039;re too far ahead :)

@Thor
We&#039;re having some internal debate here on whether or not the PhishTank sites should be blocked completely. My vote goes to blocking... we&#039;ll see how that goes (so far I&#039;m loosing).

Cheers!
Tara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TB<br />
No, that list shouldn&#8217;t get too long. We&#8217;re only putting a select few OPs in there. The rest will be accepted, but just typed in manually.</p>
<p>OpenID support for Desktop and Offline? Oh dear, I have no idea. You&#8217;re too far ahead :)</p>
<p>@Thor<br />
We&#8217;re having some internal debate here on whether or not the PhishTank sites should be blocked completely. My vote goes to blocking&#8230; we&#8217;ll see how that goes (so far I&#8217;m loosing).</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Tara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor Marius K. H</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor Marius K. H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passpack.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Great to hear that you&#039;re going to use the PhishTank API (just took a look at the comments in &quot;A question for..&quot;).

Although, I still think that sites listed in phishtank shouldn&#039;t just show a warning. A warning can &quot;potentially&quot; be bypassed if the user&#039;s browser has malicious software.

Even though it&#039;s not likely, it&#039;s possible, thus it is a security issue. I&#039;d deny any sites using PhishTank, as your chance of finding legit sites on PhishTank is extremely small.

Better safe than sorry. Especially with 100 potential passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear that you&#8217;re going to use the PhishTank API (just took a look at the comments in &#8220;A question for..&#8221;).</p>
<p>Although, I still think that sites listed in phishtank shouldn&#8217;t just show a warning. A warning can &#8220;potentially&#8221; be bypassed if the user&#8217;s browser has malicious software.</p>
<p>Even though it&#8217;s not likely, it&#8217;s possible, thus it is a security issue. I&#8217;d deny any sites using PhishTank, as your chance of finding legit sites on PhishTank is extremely small.</p>
<p>Better safe than sorry. Especially with 100 potential passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>http://blog.passpack.com/2008/08/passpacks-whitelistits-unanimous/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passpack.wordpress.com/?p=1044#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that list of icons going to get HUGE eventually?  How about also including an autocomplete feature as you type into the box?  And is a warning good enough for a phishing site?  I think it&#039;s probably best just to block that site until it&#039;s off the phishing list.

Other than those minor things, this is amazing, thanks for supporting openid!

(will there openid support for passpack offline btw?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that list of icons going to get HUGE eventually?  How about also including an autocomplete feature as you type into the box?  And is a warning good enough for a phishing site?  I think it&#8217;s probably best just to block that site until it&#8217;s off the phishing list.</p>
<p>Other than those minor things, this is amazing, thanks for supporting openid!</p>
<p>(will there openid support for passpack offline btw?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
