I’ve seen many users have trouble using the folders in their webmail, so I’m afraid of hiding any of their data under categories or labels. But, sure, you make a good point and we’ll take it into consideration.

We haven’t ruled out the possibility of using some sort of organizational system but we’re going to release first with just the quick search. From there we’ll be able to better gage user response.

I was more talking towards organizing the entries that a user has. Usually, if anybody sees too many entries at once, it kinda leaves a bad impression. So, if the user can manage the entries in categories or labels and have links to those and show only the relevant onces at once, it leaves a good impression on eyes and usability. I’m a QA by profession… so, I’m thinking more towards end user’s perspective.

You are right when you said if one label or category have many entries, it’s the same thing again. But, think of how many users will have this situation against the number of users who don’t

Me too. I’ve used programs that have labels, but many of my entries fall into the same category. I’m a web developer, so think of how “FTP” entries I have.

The quick search is really snappy fast. Say I’m looking for my SourceForge login:

(1) I type “s” and the list shortens to only entries with a “s”;

(2)when I type the second letter, “o”, the list shortens to only entries with a “so” in the title;

(3) with just three keystrokes, “sou”, I only have a few entries showing and I’ve probably already spotted my SourceForge entry.

… really, it’s immediate.

Once Beta 4 rolls, we’ll continue working. No worries.
:)

what about Passpack APIs for third party web 2.0 apps?